About The GLP-1 Guide

Who publishes this site: The GLP-1 Guide is a reader-supported editorial project from Generational Health. Some provider links are affiliate links: if you enroll with one of the providers we feature, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. What that compensation never does is change a provider's score. We compete on transparency: a published rubric, real sourced data, and honest pros and cons for every provider we review.

Who we are

The GLP-1 Guide is a publication of Generational Health. We built this site because comparing GLP-1 providers is genuinely hard: pricing is fragmented, most providers do not name their compounding pharmacy, and review counts swing wildly across sources. Our aim is to lay out the field honestly — with our affiliate compensation stated plainly rather than hidden.

Because some provider links are affiliate links, we are direct about how the site is funded. We hold ourselves to the same published rubric for every provider we review, and we show each provider's downsides alongside its strengths.

Our affiliate model and how it shapes this site

The GLP-1 Guide is published by Generational Health and is reader-supported. Some links to the providers we feature are affiliate links, and if you start treatment through one of them, we may earn a referral commission at no additional cost to you. That is a material connection, and it is why every page carries an advertising disclosure — in the footer, on this page, and next to our rankings.

What that compensation does not do is let a provider buy a better score. The rankings follow a fixed, public rubric; where a provider loses on a criterion — for example, a review volume of roughly 239 is far smaller than Mochi's ~15,600 or Henry Meds' ~12,500 — the page says so.

Our editorial process

Our rankings come from a single scoring rubric applied identically to every provider, weighted across pricing transparency (25%), pharmacy disclosure (25%), review score and volume (20%), clinical oversight (15%), and support and guarantee (15%). The full method is documented on our Methodology page.

• Real data only. We publish figures sourced from providers' own pricing pages, public review platforms (Trustpilot, the Better Business Bureau), and reputable third-party reviews. We never invent reviews, ratings, prices, patients, or providers.
• Sourced and dated. Competitor figures are labeled as sourced in June 2026 and marked "verify live," because provider pricing and review counts change frequently.
• Placeholders over guesses. Where a value is not confirmed to our standard, we show a visible placeholder instead of filling it in.
• Refreshed regularly. We aim to re-verify pricing and review data every 30 to 45 days, and each page shows a visible last-updated date.

Our medical-review process

Content that touches medication, efficacy, or safety is reviewed by a licensed medical professional, {{Medical Reviewer Name, Credential}}, whose name and credential appear in the byline of each reviewed page. Medical review checks that clinical statements are accurate, that weight-loss figures are presented as clinical-trial averages rather than promises, and that the not-FDA-approved status of compounded medication is stated wherever the medication is named.

What we do not do

We do not let compensation change a provider's score, and we do not hide that some provider links are affiliate links. We do not manufacture or compound medication; the providers we review are telehealth companies, and compounding is performed by their licensed pharmacy partners. We do not publish guarantees of weight-loss results, and we do not run this site as a link farm into other domains.

Corrections and contact

If you find a figure that looks out of date or incorrect, we want to fix it. Provider pricing and review counts move quickly, so we treat corrections seriously and re-verify against the source. To report an inaccuracy, email us at {{editorial contact email}} with the page URL.